Comparisons 21-06-2021 Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 985, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or Kirin 985.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Kirin 985 | 82% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Kirin 985 | 77% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 985 | Total score | 897135 | 423580 | CPU | 268491 | 134631 | GPU | 334895 | 142013 | MEM | 153388 | 79179 | UX | 139755 | 67029 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 985 | Single-Core | 1251 | 880 | Multi-Core | 3945 | 2995 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 985 | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2580 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 1x2.58 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 4x1.84 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1600 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 34.1 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 512 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Pro is 14% better than Kirin 985 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G77 MP8 | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 1486 | 628 | # of Cores | | 8 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | 27.6 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 54.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 56.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 41.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 45.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 75.1 | Real Racing 3 | | 98.4 | Sniper 3D | | 106.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | | 89.9 | Mortal Kombat X | | 73.1 | CSR Racing 2 | | 73.1 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 32 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | 21 | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 1277 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 175 MBit/s. | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | Yes | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 26
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 985 is better: 14 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • 3DMark • Antutu 8 • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 985 • Apple A12Z Bionic Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
|