Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, comparison of GPUs Adreno 620 and Apple A14 Bionic.

This performance comparison includes two processors: A14 Bionic is gexa-core (Icestorm) and Snapdragon 765G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in special test applications such as PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Geekbench, WebXPRT 3, AnTuTu 8, Vellamo, Quadrant, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Minecraft Bedrock etc.

After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy A14 Bionic or Snapdragon 765G and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

A14 Bionic

41%

Snapdragon 765G

21%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

A14 Bionic

78%

Snapdragon 765G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

A14 Bionic

38%

Snapdragon 765G

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	A14 Bionic	Snapdragon 765G
Total score	571583	304160
CPU	160050	85154
GPU	217206	115588
MEM	91462	48671
UX	102894	54738

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	A14 Bionic	Snapdragon 765G
Single-Core	1621	681
Multi-Core	4180	2316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	A14 Bionic	Snapdragon 765G
Frequency	3000 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	6	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	11800000 millions
Core configuration	8x3 GHz Icestorm 4x1.8 GHz Firestorm	1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	6 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	4266	2133
Memory bandwidth	42.7	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here A14 Bionic is 19% better than Snapdragon 765G in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that A14 Bionic has 2 more core than Snapdragon 765G. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Apple A14 Bionic	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	3000 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	1480	896
# of Cores	4
# of Shader Units		384
Display	2732 x 2048 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.8	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	60.9	55.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.3	62.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	57.5	40.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	47.5	51.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	74.8	75.6
Real Racing 3	98.5	93.8
Sniper 3D	73.2	137.5
Need for Speed No Limits	67.6	112.5
Mortal Kombat X	73.2	100
CSR Racing 2	67.6	75

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	12 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	12 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Apple ISP	Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	960	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Snapdragon X60 5G	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	3000 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC enabled, GNSS, NavIC, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, QZSS, SBAS, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Apple A14 Bionic is better: 28
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors A14 Bionic and Snapdragon 765G, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

A14 Bionic SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• A14 Bionic specs and review.

Snapdragon 765G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 765G specs and review.