Comparisons 20-05-2022 Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, Neocore, AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2 etc. After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or Snapdragon 888 Pro.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | Total score | 801200 | 897135 | CPU | 163368 | 268491 | GPU | 139627 | 334895 | MEM | 106600 | 153388 | UX | 93142 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | Single-Core | 1455 | 1251 | Multi-Core | 4766 | 3945 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Snapdragon 888 Pro | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3000 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 2750 | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 44 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 32 KB | 512 KB | L2 cache | 320 KB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 4 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 660 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 700 MHz | GFloPS | 504 | 1486 | # of Cores | 9 | | # of Shader Units | | 512 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 64 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7500 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3000 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 17 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
|