Comparisons 21-06-2021
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, Vellamo, Neocore, Geekbench, GFXBench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Call of Duty, Minecraft, Madout2, GTA etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro or Kirin 990E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 99% |
Kirin 990E | 84% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 84% |
Kirin 990E | 77% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 888 Pro | 94% |
Kirin 990E | 77% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 990E | | Total score | 897135 | 433894 | | CPU | 268491 | 145706 | | GPU | 334895 | 153519 | | MEM | 153388 | 85336 | | UX | 139755 | 72722 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 990E | | Single-Core | 1251 | 929 | | Multi-Core | 3945 | 3068 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 888 Pro |
Kirin 990E | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 2860 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10300 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X1
3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | 2x2.86 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
2x2.36 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x1.95 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 12 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2750 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 31.78 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 512 KB | | L3 cache | 4 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 888 Pro is 4% better than Kirin 990E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 660 | Mali-G76 MP12 | | GPU Frequency | 700 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1486 | 489.38 | | # of Cores | | 12 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 3840 x 2160 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 56.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 58.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 42.3 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 47.8 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 77.8 | | Real Racing 3 | | 102.7 | | Sniper 3D | | 111.5 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 93.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 67.5 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 64.6 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 32 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 580 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X60 Modem-RF System 5G | 5G NR | | Download speed | 7500 MBit/s. | 2300 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 3000 MBit/s. | 1250 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, GNSS, GLONASS, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC, QZSS, NavIC enabled | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro is better: 24
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 990E is better: 16
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 990E
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
