|
Unisoc UIS8141E vs MediaTek MT6739WW |
|
Comparisons 03-11-2023 Full comparison data of Unisoc UIS8141E vs MediaTek MT6739WW, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Quadrant, PCMark, Vellamo, Neocore, AnTuTu, GFXBench, 3DMark, PassMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Madout2, Fortnite, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Unisoc UIS8141E or MT6739WW.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
MT6739WW | 2% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Unisoc UIS8141E | 42% |
MT6739WW | 29% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingUnisoc UIS8141E | 1% |
MT6739WW | 1% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Unisoc UIS8141E |
MT6739WW | Total score | 42551 | 35685 | CPU | 11923 | 9986 | GPU | 16177 | 13560 | MEM | 6807 | 5708 | UX | 7663 | 6433 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Unisoc UIS8141E |
MT6739WW | Single-Core | 112 | 94 | Multi-Core | 519 | 436 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Unisoc UIS8141E |
MT6739WW | Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1500 MHz | Cores | 4 | 4 | Bit | 32 | 64 | Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7 | 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53 | Power consumption (TDP) | 3 W | 7 W | Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3 | Max. Memory | 6 Gb | 3 Gb | Memory Frequency | 266 | 667 | Memory bandwidth | 18 | 4 | Neural Processor (NPU) | No | No | L1 cache | 128 KB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6739WW is 13% better than Unisoc UIS8141E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-T820 | PowerVR GE8100 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 570 MHz | GFloPS | 10.2 | 11.2 | # of Cores | 1 | 1 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 1440 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 12.2 | 11.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 34.6 | 28.3 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 22.5 | 18.6 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 20.5 | 15.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 29.1 | 24.4 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 44.5 | 36.8 | Real Racing 3 | 40.2 | 37.2 | Sniper 3D | 29.8 | 29.8 | Need for Speed No Limits | 41.1 | 29.8 | Mortal Kombat X | 26.5 | 27 | CSR Racing 2 | 32.8 | 22.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 13 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 30 | 30 | Video Encoding resolution | FullHD | FullHD | Codec support | H.264 | H.264 |
Networks and NavigationModem | | | Download speed | 300 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 50 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | GPS, Glonass, Beidou | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc UIS8141E is better: 25
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WW is better: 6 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Unisoc UIS8141E SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek Helio A20 • Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755) • Vs MediaTek Helio A22 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 • Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763) • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Unisoc SC79863a • Vs Unisoc Tiger T310 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7510 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T7520 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9830 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
MT6739WW SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570 • Vs MediaTek MT6753 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 • Vs Unisoc SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT6737T • Vs MediaTek MT6739 • Vs MediaTek MT6739V • Vs MediaTek MT6739WA • Vs MediaTek MT6750 • Vs Atom Z3560 • Vs Unisoc SC9850K • Vs MediaTek MT6750S • Vs MediaTek MT6752 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580 • Vs Atom Z3580 • Vs MediaTek MT6750T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930 • Vs Atom Z3590 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 • Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795) • Vs MediaTek MT6595 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650 • Vs MediaTek MT6737 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832 • Vs MediaTek MT8321 • Vs MediaTek MT6580 • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731 • Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578 • Vs MediaTek MT8163 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 • Vs MediaTek MT6592 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E • Vs MediaTek MT8735 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9850 • Vs MediaTek MT6737M • Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 • Vs MediaTek MT6739WM • Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420 • Vs MediaTek MT6580A • Vs MediaTek MT6580M • Vs MediaTek MT8735M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920 • Vs MediaTek MT6735 • Vs MediaTek MT6735P • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs MediaTek MT6737V • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 • Vs MediaTek MT6592M • Vs Spreadtrum SC8830 • Vs MediaTek MT8127 • Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A • Vs MediaTek MT8783 • Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 • Vs MediaTek MT8735B • Vs MediaTek MT8382 • Vs MediaTek MT6732M • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228 • Vs MediaTek MT6582 • Vs MediaTek MT8732 • Vs MediaTek MT8735W • Vs MediaTek MT8765B • Vs MediaTek MT6737H • Vs MediaTek MT8167D • Vs MediaTek MT6732 • Vs MediaTek MT6738 • Vs MediaTek MT6753T • Vs Unisoc SC7331e • Vs MediaTek MT8167A • Vs MediaTek MT6731 • Vs Rockchip RK3326S
| |
|