MediaTek MT6739WW vs Intel Atom Z3560

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Detailed comparison data of benchmarks MediaTek MT6739WW vs Intel Atom Z3560, speed examination of GPUs PowerVR G6430 and PowerVR GE8100.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6739WW is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and Atom Z3560 is quad-core (Moorefield). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as AnTuTu, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, PassMark, WebXPRT 3, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, 3DMark, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, even the gaming performance of processors in Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MT6739WW or Atom Z3560 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WW

Atom Z3560

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WW

29%

Atom Z3560

35%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WW

Atom Z3560

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WW	Atom Z3560
Total score	35685	40523
CPU	9986	11354
GPU	13560	15398
MEM	5708	6474
UX	6433	7284

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WW	Atom Z3560
Single-Core	94	107
Multi-Core	436	495

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WW	Atom Z3560
Frequency	1500 MHz	1800 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	64
Lithography	28 nm	22 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.8 GHz Moorefield
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	3 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR3
Max. Memory	3 Gb	4 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	1600
Memory bandwidth	4	14
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom Z3560 is 16% better than MT6739WW in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8100	PowerVR G6430
GPU Frequency	570 MHz	533 MHz
GFloPS	11.2	136.4
# of Cores	1	4
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.2	13.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	28.3	33.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.6	22.8
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.4	19.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	24.4	28.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	36.8	42.3
Real Racing 3	37.2	39.9
Sniper 3D	29.8	29.6
Need for Speed No Limits	29.8	27.4
Mortal Kombat X	27	33.1
CSR Racing 2	22.3	25.1

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem		Intel XMM 7160
Download speed	150 MBit/s.	72 MBit/s.
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.	6 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WW is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom Z3560 is better: 28
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips MT6739WW and Atom Z3560, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6739WW SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6739WW specs and review.

Atom Z3560 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• Atom Z3560 specs and review.