MediaTek MT6580M vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6580M vs MediaTek MT6580, comparison of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison involves two processors: MT6580M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Vellamo, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, 3DMark, WebXPRT 3, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, Quadrant, Octane V2, PassMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Mortal Kombat, Minecraft Bedrock, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chipset is better to buy MT6580M or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: Asphalt 9, Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6580M

MT6580

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6580M

28%

MT6580

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6580M

MT6580

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6580M	MT6580
Total score	20414	20999
CPU	5715	5884
GPU	7765	7987
MEM	3276	3365
UX	3675	3787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6580M	MT6580
Single-Core	54	55
Multi-Core	249	256

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6580M	MT6580
Frequency	1300 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	32	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A7	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR2	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	1 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	266	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 13% better than MT6580M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-400 MP2	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	400 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	8.4	8.4
# of Cores	2	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1280 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	5.3	6.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	16.1	17.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	10.8	11.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	8.6	9.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	12.3	13.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	20.2	21.2
Real Racing 3	21.6	16.8
Sniper 3D	23.8	21.3
Need for Speed No Limits	19.4	13.4
Mortal Kombat X	15.7	16.2
CSR Racing 2	14	13.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580M is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 15
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full benchmark video of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MT6580M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MT6580M specs and review.

MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6580 specs and review.