Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons 11-03-2021

Well, which processor or chip is better? Detailed data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc SC9832E vs MediaTek MT6580, compare of GPUs Mali-400 MP2 and Mali-T820.

This performance comparison involves two processors: SC9832E is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A careful review of all the technical characteristics of the chips, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Neocore, Mozilla Kraken, Octane V2, GFXBench, Geekbench, Vellamo, PCMark, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the chips are in games Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Mortal Kombat, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Real Racing 3 etc.

After reading the results these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which processors is better to buy SC9832E or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

SC9832E

MT6580

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

SC9832E

32%

MT6580

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

SC9832E

MT6580

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	SC9832E	MT6580
Total score	38067	20999
CPU	10664	5884
GPU	14464	7987
MEM	6088	3365
UX	6855	3787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	SC9832E	MT6580
Single-Core	101	55
Multi-Core	465	256

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	SC9832E	MT6580
Frequency	1400 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	3 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	4 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	933	266
Memory bandwidth	6	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	128 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	2 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 6% better than SC9832E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-T820	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	10.2	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	11.9	6.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	30.9	17.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	19.8	11.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	16.7	9.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	25.5	13.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	38.4	21.2
Real Racing 3	29.7	16.8
Sniper 3D	37.6	21.3
Need for Speed No Limits	23.8	13.4
Mortal Kombat X	31.7	16.2
CSR Racing 2	21.8	13.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem	LTE-4
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9832E is better: 32
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets SC9832E and MT6580, as well as read the test results at the links below.

SC9832E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• SC9832E specs and review.

MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6580 specs and review.