Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 vs MediaTek MT6580 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive compare data of benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 vs MediaTek MT6580, speed testing of GPUs Adreno 200 and Mali-400 MP2.

   This performance comparison includes two processors: Snapdragon S1 is single-core (ARM Cortex-A9) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table.

   From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in software tests like Vellamo, 3DMark, PassMark, AnTuTu 8, Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, GeekBench 6, 5, PCMark, GFXBench, Octane V2, WebXPRT 3, Quadrant, and how good the processors are in games Minecraft Bedrock, Call of Duty: Mobile, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Sniper 3D, Fortnite, PUBG, Mortal Kombat etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon S1 or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.


 
MediaTek MT6580

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon S11% MT65801%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon S1-62% MT658027%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon S11% MT65801%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon S1 MT6580
Total score1678920999
CPU46955884
GPU63797987
MEM26913365
UX30213787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon S1 MT6580
Single-Core4455
Multi-Core205256

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon S1 MT6580
Frequency1000 MHz1500 MHz
Cores14
Bit3232
Lithography65 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x1.0GHz ARM Cortex-A94x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)4 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2LPDDR2
Max. Memory0.5 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency266266
Memory bandwidth64
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache1 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 33% better than Snapdragon S1 in terms of CPU frequency. Another difference is that Snapdragon S1 has 3 more core than MT6580. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 200Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency133 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS2.18.4
# of Cores2
# of Shader Units8
Display840 x 480 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile3.86.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)12.117.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra6.911.2
Call of Duty: Mobile6.99.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)9.513.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition15.121.2
Real Racing 312.116.8
Sniper 3D13.121.3
Need for Speed No Limits9.713.4
Mortal Kombat X7.916.2
CSR Racing 28.313.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution5 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Upload speed
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 29
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors Snapdragon S1 and MT6580, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon S1 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


Snapdragon S1 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs MediaTek MT6572A
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


MT6580 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Unisoc SC9850K
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands