Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Unisoc SC9850K vs MediaTek MT6580 benchmark which processor is better

Unisoc SC9850K vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   So, which processor or chip is better? Comprehensive data of benchmarks and speed tests Unisoc SC9850K vs MediaTek MT6580, compare of GPUs Mali-T820 and Mali-400 MP2.

   This performance comparison involves two processors: SC9850K is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough review of all the specifications of the chips, to make it easier to read, is made by the table.

   From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint benchmarking in synthetic type tests like Mozilla Kraken, Neocore, AnTuTu, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, PCMark, Octane V2, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft Bedrock, Mortal Kombat, Real Racing 3, Sniper 3D, PUBG, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Fortnite, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy SC9850K or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, Madout2.


 
Unisoc SC9850K
MediaTek MT6580

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
SC9850K3% MT65801%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
SC9850K30% MT658027%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
SC9850K1% MT65801%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
SC9850K MT6580
Total score4171720999
CPU116845884
GPU158617987
MEM66723365
UX75073787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
SC9850K MT6580
Single-Core11055
Multi-Core509256

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
SC9850K MT6580
Frequency1300 MHz1500 MHz
Cores44
Bit3232
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.3 GHz ARM Cortex-A74x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)3 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR3LPDDR2
Max. Memory4 Gb1 Gb
Memory Frequency266266
Memory bandwidth144
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 13% better than SC9850K in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-T820Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency600 MHz400 MHz
GFloPS10.28.4
# of Cores12
# of Shader Units
Display1440 x 720 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile12.76.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)33.617.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra22.611.2
Call of Duty: Mobile19.59.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)27.713.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition42.721.2
Real Racing 339.616.8
Sniper 3D29.421.3
Need for Speed No Limits40.713.4
Mortal Kombat X36.216.2
CSR Racing 227.113.4
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264H.264


Networks and Navigation
Modem
Upload speed150 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, BeidouGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Unisoc SC9850K is better: 30
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 3
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
SC9850K SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark


SC9850K SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6750S
• Vs MediaTek MT6752
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7580
• Vs Atom Z3580
• Vs MediaTek MT6750T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MSM8937
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 MSM8940
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974AC
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
• Vs Atom Z3590
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795)
• Vs MediaTek MT6595
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 650
• Vs Unisoc SC9853I
• Vs MediaTek Helio A20
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
• Vs MediaTek Helio P10 (MT6755)
• Vs MediaTek Helio A22
• Vs MediaTek Helio P15 (MT6755 Pro)
• Vs MediaTek Helio X10 (MT6795T)
• Vs MediaTek Helio P18
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5430
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
• Vs MediaTek Helio P23 (MT6763)
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 658
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 655
• Vs MediaTek Helio P25 Lite (MT6757CD)
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 805
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs MediaTek MT6732
• Vs MediaTek MT6738
• Vs MediaTek MT6753T
• Vs Unisoc SC7331e
• Vs MediaTek MT6731
• Vs Rockchip RK3326S
• Vs Qualcomm QCM2290


MT6580 SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9863A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917
• Vs MediaTek MT6750
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs MediaTek MT6739
• Vs Unisoc SC9832E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7570
• Vs MediaTek MT6753
• Vs MediaTek MT6739V
• Vs Atom Z3560
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WA
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939
• Vs MediaTek MT6737T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WW
• Vs Samsung Exynos 7 Quad 7578
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 427 MSM8920
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs MediaTek MT6735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Atom x3-C3230RK
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT8167A
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands