MediaTek MT6739WM vs MediaTek MT6580

Comparisons 11-03-2021

So, which chip or processor is better? Detailed data of speed tests and benchmarks MediaTek MT6739WM vs MediaTek MT6580, compare of GPUs PowerVR GE8100 and Mali-400 MP2.

This performance comparison includes two processors: MT6739WM is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53) and MT6580 is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A7). Both processors went throughpower consumption test and battery life test. A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table.

From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in special testing software like Geekbench, Neocore, WebXPRT 3, 3DMark, Octane V2, Mozilla Kraken, GFXBench, Quadrant, Vellamo, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, PassMark, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Sniper 3D, Mortal Kombat, Fortnite, Real Racing 3, Minecraft Bedrock, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Call of Duty: Mobile etc.

After looking at the data of joint benchmarks and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MT6739WM or MT6580 and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, CSR Racing 2, Asphalt 9, Need for Speed No Limits.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MT6739WM

MT6580

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MT6739WM

30%

MT6580

27%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MT6739WM

MT6580

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MT6739WM	MT6580
Total score	34420	20999
CPU	9642	5884
GPU	13080	7987
MEM	5508	3365
UX	6201	3787

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MT6739WM	MT6580
Single-Core	91	55
Multi-Core	420	256

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MT6739WM	MT6580
Frequency	1100 MHz	1500 MHz
Cores	4	4
Bit	64	32
Lithography	28 nm	28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x1.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A53	4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A7
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR3	LPDDR2
Max. Memory	3 Gb	1 Gb
Memory Frequency	667	266
Memory bandwidth	4	4
Neural Processor (NPU)	No	No
L1 cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MT6580 is 26% better than MT6739WM in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	PowerVR GE8100	Mali-400 MP2
GPU Frequency	570 MHz	400 MHz
GFloPS	11.2	8.4
# of Cores	1	2
# of Shader Units
Display	1440 x 720 pixels	1280 x 720 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	10.1	6.9
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	27.1	17.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	18.4	11.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	15.5	9.8
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	23.4	13.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	35.1	21.2
Real Racing 3	27.6	16.8
Sniper 3D	23.9	21.3
Need for Speed No Limits	29.4	13.4
Mortal Kombat X	21.2	16.2
CSR Racing 2	23.9	13.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	13 MP	13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	30	30
Video Encoding resolution	FullHD	FullHD
Codec support	H.264	H.264

Networks and Navigation

Modem
Upload speed	50 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6739WM is better: 28
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6580 is better: 2
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MT6739WM SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• 3DMark

• MT6739WM specs and review.

MT6580 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark

• MT6580 specs and review.