Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Intel Atom x3-C3230RK vs MediaTek MT6735M benchmark which processor is better

Intel Atom x3-C3230RK vs MediaTek MT6735M

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full comparison data of benchmarks Intel Atom x3-C3230RK vs MediaTek MT6735M, speed testing of GPUs Mali-T720 and Mali-450 MP4.
   This performance comparison involves two processors: Atom x3-C3230RK is quad-core () and MT6735M is quad-core (ARM Cortex-A53). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as WebXPRT 3, Octane V2, PCMark, Mozilla Kraken, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in PUBG, Fortnite, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Minecraft Bedrock, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3 etc.
   After reading the results of all benchmarks and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy Atom x3-C3230RK or MT6735M and which chip is better for gaming: Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9, CSR Racing 2.

 
Intel Atom x3-C3230RK
MediaTek MT6735M

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Atom x3-C3230RK1% MT6735M1%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Atom x3-C3230RK26% MT6735M24%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Atom x3-C3230RK1% MT6735M1%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Atom x3-C3230RK MT6735M
Total score1947120157
CPU54445642
GPU73987668
MEM31063232
UX35053622

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Atom x3-C3230RK MT6735M
Single-Core5153
Multi-Core238246

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Atom x3-C3230RK MT6735M
Frequency1100 MHz1000 MHz
Cores44
Bit6464
Lithography28 nm28 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration4x1.1 GHz4x1.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A53
Power consumption (TDP)7 W7 W
Memory typeLPDDR2/3LPDDR3 (Single Channel)
Max. Memory2 Gb4 Gb
Memory Frequency1333667
Memory bandwidth44
Neural Processor (NPU)NoNo
L1 cache128 KB32 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache8 MB1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Atom x3-C3230RK is 9% better than MT6735M in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-450 MP4Mali-T720
GPU Frequency600 MHz450 MHz
GFloPS35.777.65
# of Cores41
# of Shader Units
Display1920 x 1080 pixels1280 x 720 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile6.14.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)16.515.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra10.29.2
Call of Duty: Mobile9.77.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)13.111.4
Minecraft: Pocket Edition20.319.1
Real Racing 320.418.4
Sniper 3D16.320.2
Need for Speed No Limits18.412.9
Mortal Kombat X13.312
CSR Racing 211.210.1
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly.
    Due to the low performance of the processors, the results of the gaming tests are calculated by analogy with other more powerful CPUs from the site database. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.


Cameras
Camera resolution13 MP13 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS3030
Video Encoding resolutionFullHDFullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVCH.264


Networks and Navigation
ModemA-GOLD 620
Download speed21 MBit/s.150 MBit/s.
Upload speed6 MBit/s.50 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportNoNo
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which Intel Atom x3-C3230RK is better: 20
The number of parameters for which MediaTek MT6735M is better: 13
   You need to know that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Atom x3-C3230RK SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MT6735M SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Atom x3-C3230RK SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575


MT6735M SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek MT6580A
• Vs MediaTek MT6580M
• Vs MediaTek MT6580
• Vs MediaTek MT8735M
• Vs MediaTek MT8321
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731E
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832A
• Vs Spreadtrum SC8830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 215
• Vs MediaTek MT6735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9850
• Vs MediaTek MT8127
• Vs MediaTek MT6737V
• Vs MediaTek MT8735
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9832E
• Vs MediaTek MT6737M
• Vs MediaTek MT6735
• Vs MediaTek MT6592M
• Vs MediaTek MT8783
• Vs MediaTek MT6737
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916
• Vs MediaTek MT6592
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974
• Vs MediaTek MT8163
• Vs Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5420
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 620
• Vs MediaTek MT6739WM
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731G
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7731C
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830A
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928
• Vs MediaTek MT6570
• Vs MediaTek MT8312
• Vs MediaTek MT8735B
• Vs Rockchip RK3126C
• Vs MediaTek MT8382
• Vs MediaTek MT6580P
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8210
• Vs MediaTek MT6732M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8228
• Vs MediaTek MT6582
• Vs MediaTek MT6572
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016
• Vs MediaTek MT6572M
• Vs MediaTek MT8732
• Vs MediaTek MT8735W
• Vs Spreadtrum SC9830
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 APQ8026
• Vs MediaTek MT8765B
• Vs Atom x3-C3130
• Vs MediaTek MT6589
• Vs MediaTek MT8389
• Vs Atom Z3735F
• Vs MediaTek MT6582M
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
• Vs MediaTek MT8312CW
• Vs Atom Z2520
• Vs MediaTek MT6737H
• Vs Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3470
• Vs MediaTek MT8167D
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S1
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SW
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 MSM8909 v2
• Vs Atom x3-C3200RK
• Vs Samsung Exynos 4 Quad 4412
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8225
• Vs MediaTek MT6735T
• Vs Spreadtrum SC7730SE
• Vs MediaTek MT8735P
• Vs Spreadtrum SC5735
• Vs MediaTek MT6575
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands