Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898

Comparisons   20-05-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1300T or Snapdragon 898.

 
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 898

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T95% Snapdragon 89899%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T87% Snapdragon 89884%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T89% Snapdragon 89894%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Snapdragon 898
Total score6945351004791
CPU163368268491
GPU139627334895
MEM106600153388
UX93142139755

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Snapdragon 898
Single-Core14771401
Multi-Core45854418

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Snapdragon 898
Frequency2600 MHz3090 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm4 nm
Transistors count5800 millions
Core configuration2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)10 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory16 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency21333200
Memory bandwidth2988
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache32 KB1 MB
L2 cache320 KB2 MB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 15% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G77 MC9Adreno 730
GPU Frequency800 MHz970 MHz
GFloPS5041800
# of Cores9
# of Shader Units1024
Display2560 x 1440 pixels7680 x 4320 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra
Call of Duty: Mobile
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)
Minecraft: Pocket Edition
Real Racing 3
Sniper 3D
Need for Speed No Limits
Mortal Kombat X
CSR Racing 2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution200 MP320 MP
Dual Camera resolution32 MP128 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 680
Video Encoding FPS240120
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeQualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed4700 MBit/s.15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.6000 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OFNavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 22
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX G..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1200..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1100..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 865..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1050..
Exynos 2200 vs A14 Bionic..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 778G+..