Comparisons 29-07-2021
Full testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 vs Apple A12Z Bionic, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like 3DMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, Minecraft, GTA, Madout2, PUBG etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which chip is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 or A12Z Bionic.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
A12Z Bionic | 99% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
A12Z Bionic | 95% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 898 |
A12Z Bionic | | Total score | 1004791 | 729707 | | CPU | 268491 | 179367 | | GPU | 334895 | 371998 | | MEM | 153388 | 95242 | | UX | 139755 | 75217 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 898 |
A12Z Bionic | | Single-Core | 1401 | 1332 | | Multi-Core | 4418 | 4661 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 898 |
A12Z Bionic | | Frequency | 3090 MHz | 2490 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | 10000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 4x2.49GHz Vortex
4x1.6 GHz Tempest | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4X | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 42 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 48 KB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 4 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 19% better than A12Z Bionic in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Apple A12Z Bionic | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 2500 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 1486 | | # of Cores | | 8 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2732 x 2048 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 28.8 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 86.5 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 52.4 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 48.4 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 74.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 107.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 104.8 | | Sniper 3D | | 115.3 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 62.9 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 83.8 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 68.1 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 12 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 128 MP | 12 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Apple ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 960 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.265 (HEVC), HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, H.264 (AVC), VP8, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Intel XMM 7560 LTE | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 1000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 350 MBit/s. | | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | Beidou, GPS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 20
The number of parameters for which Apple A12Z Bionic is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Snapdragon 875 Vs A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
|
