Comparisons 29-07-2021
Detailed comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 vs Samsung Exynos 990, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chipsets, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, AnTuTu 8, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench 5, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 or Exynos 990.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
Exynos 990 | 93% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
Exynos 990 | 75% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
Exynos 990 | 90% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 898 |
Exynos 990 | | Total score | 1004791 | 520426 | | CPU | 268491 | 150964 | | GPU | 334895 | 211669 | | MEM | 153388 | 82183 | | UX | 139755 | 75906 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 898 |
Exynos 990 | | Single-Core | 1401 | 1108 | | Multi-Core | 4418 | 3435 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 898 |
Exynos 990 | | Frequency | 3090 MHz | 3300 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.93 GHz Exynos M5 Mongoose
2x2.56 GHz ARM Cortex-A76
4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 9 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1866 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Exynos 990 is 6% better than Snapdragon 898 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MP11 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 786 | | # of Cores | | 11 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 61.6 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 55.2 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 61.5 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 61.7 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 49.3 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 75.3 | | Real Racing 3 | | 123 | | Sniper 3D | | 116.9 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 86.1 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 80 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 80 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 108 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 128 MP | 25 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, 10-bit H.265/HEVC, VP9 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 3486 MBit/s. | | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, GPS, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | No | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 27
The number of parameters for which Samsung Exynos 990 is better: 13
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
• Antutu 8
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Exynos 990
• Apple A12Z Bionic Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000E Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Samsung Exynos 1080 Vs Samsung Exynos 990
|
