Comparisons 10-07-2022 Full compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 or MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 99% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 95% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 89% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | 97% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Total score | 1085878 | 694535 | CPU | 268491 | 163368 | GPU | 334895 | 139627 | MEM | 153388 | 106600 | UX | 139755 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Single-Core | 1514 | 1477 | Multi-Core | 4774 | 4585 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 4 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | 5800 millions | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 1 MB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 2 MB | 320 KB | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is 18% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 1800 | 504 | # of Cores | | 9 | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 685 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, Galileo, GNSS, SBAS, QZSS, Beidou, GLONASS, NavIC | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 5 You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
|