Comparisons 17-05-2022 Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like PassMark, GFXBench, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PCMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Madout2, Fortnite etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8000 or Snapdragon 898.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 96% |
Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 88% |
Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8000 | 91% |
Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Snapdragon 898 | Total score | 777515 | 1004791 | CPU | 163368 | 268491 | GPU | 139627 | 334895 | MEM | 106600 | 153388 | UX | 93142 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Snapdragon 898 | Single-Core | 1145 | 1401 | Multi-Core | 4015 | 4418 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8000 |
Snapdragon 898 | Frequency | 2750 MHz | 3090 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.75 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2 3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 6 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 88 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 64 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 640 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 11% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Adreno 730 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 970 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 1800 | # of Cores | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 128 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8000 is better: 6
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 23 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
|