Comparisons 29-07-2021
Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, 3DMark, PassMark, Quadrant, Vellamo, Geekbench, and how good the chips are in games PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty, Fortnite, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 or Kirin 9000E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
Kirin 9000E | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
Kirin 9000E | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
Kirin 9000E | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 898 |
Kirin 9000E | | Total score | 1004791 | 678577 | | CPU | 268491 | 216046 | | GPU | 334895 | 227655 | | MEM | 153388 | 126580 | | UX | 139755 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 898 |
Kirin 9000E | | Single-Core | 1401 | 992 | | Multi-Core | 4418 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 898 |
Kirin 9000E | | Frequency | 3090 MHz | 313 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 89% better than Kirin 9000E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 986 | | # of Cores | | 22 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 80.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 100.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 60.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 107.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 87.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 70.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 58.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 128 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 24
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
|
