Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max

Comparisons   20-05-2022
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1300T or Dimensity 1200 Max.

 
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors

CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T95% Dimensity 1200 Max95%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T87% Dimensity 1200 Max87%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T89% Dimensity 1200 Max89%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Dimensity 1200 Max
Total score694535691455
CPU163368163368
GPU139627139627
MEM106600106600
UX9314293142

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Dimensity 1200 Max
Single-Core14771470
Multi-Core45854564

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Dimensity 1200 Max
Frequency2600 MHz3100 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm6 nm
Transistors count5800 millions5800 millions
Core configuration2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)10 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR4xLPDDR4x
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency21334266
Memory bandwidth2929
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache32 KB32 KB
L2 cache320 KB320 KB
L3 cache8 MB8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 Max is 16% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G77 MC9Mali-G77 MP11
GPU Frequency800 MHz800 MHz
GFloPS504786
# of Cores911
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2520 x 1080 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra
Call of Duty: Mobile
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)
Minecraft: Pocket Edition
Real Racing 3
Sniper 3D
Need for Speed No Limits
Mortal Kombat X
CSR Racing 2
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution200 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution32 MP32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCH.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed4700 MBit/s.4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OFGPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max is better: 4
   Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
Categories
 • Comparisons
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands
Last added

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX G..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX C..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5995WX vs..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1200..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1100..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 865..
Exynos 2200 vs Dimensity 1050..
Exynos 2200 vs A14 Bionic..
Exynos 2200 vs Snapdragon 778G+..