Comparisons 20-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Kompanio 1300T vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the processors, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PassMark, GFXBench, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 1300T or Dimensity 1200 Max.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 95% |
Dimensity 1200 Max | 95% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 87% |
Dimensity 1200 Max | 87% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 89% |
Dimensity 1200 Max | 89% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Dimensity 1200 Max | | Total score | 694535 | 691455 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Dimensity 1200 Max | | Single-Core | 1477 | 1470 | | Multi-Core | 4585 | 4564 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
Dimensity 1200 Max | | Frequency | 2600 MHz | 3100 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | 5800 millions | | Core configuration | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3x2.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 4266 | | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 29 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 32 KB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 320 KB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 1200 Max is 16% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MP11 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 786 | | # of Cores | 9 | 11 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, NavIC | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 5
The number of parameters for which Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max is better: 4
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
