Comparisons 03-12-2021
Detailed comparison data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications like Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Geekbench, AnTuTu, Neocore, PassMark, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 or Snapdragon 898.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 99% |
Snapdragon 898 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 84% |
Snapdragon 898 | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | 94% |
Snapdragon 898 | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Total score | 1014839 | 1004791 | | CPU | 268491 | 268491 | | GPU | 334895 | 334895 | | MEM | 153388 | 153388 | | UX | 139755 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Single-Core | 1415 | 1401 | | Multi-Core | 4462 | 4418 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 |
Snapdragon 898 | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3090 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | | | | Core configuration | 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3.09 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A510
2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 88 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 898 is 2% better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Adreno 730 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 1800 | | # of Cores | | | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | 1024 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 320 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 128 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | NavIC enabled, GNSS, Beidou, Galileo, NavIC, GPS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS, QZSS, SBAS | NavIC enabled, GLONASS, Galileo, GPS, SBAS, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, Beidou, NavIC, QZSS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is better: 3
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 is better: 3
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
|
