|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T |
|
Comparisons 01-11-2024 Detailed compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as 3DMark, PassMark, Geekbench, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Vellamo, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Elite or MediaTek Kompanio 1300T.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Elite | 100% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 50% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Elite | 88% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 79% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Elite | 98% |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | 48% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Total score | 3123644 | 694535 | CPU | 874624 | 194474 | GPU | 1186984 | 263927 | MEM | 499774 | 111132 | UX | 562252 | 125023 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Single-Core | 3395 | 1477 | Multi-Core | 10489 | 4585 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T | Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2600 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | 5800 millions | Core configuration | 2x4.32 GHz Oryon (Phoenix L) 6x3.53 GHz Oryon (Phoenix M) | 2x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5300 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 29 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | 32 KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 320 KB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Elite is 39% better than MediaTek Kompanio 1300T in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G77 MC9 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 800 MHz | GFloPS | 3382 | 504 | # of Cores | | 9 | # of Shader Units | 3072 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 116.6 | 27.5 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 372.6 | 83.1 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 220.1 | 50.9 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 205.1 | 46.5 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 314.4 | 70.9 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 454.5 | 102.5 | Real Racing 3 | 444.4 | 88.9 | Sniper 3D | 485.2 | 65.1 | Need for Speed No Limits | 309.7 | 60.5 | Mortal Kombat X | 321.3 | 65.9 | CSR Racing 2 | 265.5 | 60.9 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 240 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X80 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, QZSS, GPS, NavIC, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC enabled | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better: 38
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 1300T is better: 3 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
MediaTek Kompanio 1300T SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|