Comparisons 13-07-2022
Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 93% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 89% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 95% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 92% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Total score | 1062639 | 785369 | | CPU | 163368 | 163368 | | GPU | 139627 | 139627 | | MEM | 106600 | 106600 | | UX | 93142 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 1157 | | Multi-Core | 4417 | 4056 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2850 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 8400 millions | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 48 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 640 KB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G610 MP6 | | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 1648 | 912 | | # of Cores | 10 | 6 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5 | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 16
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
|
