MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100

Comparisons 13-07-2022

Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like 3DMark, GFXBench, PassMark, Geekbench, PCMark, AnTuTu, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in GTA, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

76%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

56%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

82%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

75%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

54%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Total score	1062639	785369
CPU	297529	219905
GPU	403808	298431
MEM	170016	125656
UX	191283	141372

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Single-Core	1215	1157
Multi-Core	4417	4056

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Frequency	3200 MHz	2850 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8400 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	6400
Memory bandwidth	52	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	64 KB
L2 cache	8 MB	640 KB
L3 cache	32 MB	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8100 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G710 MC10	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	1648	912
# of Cores	10	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	40.4	30.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	125.6	93.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	75.2	55.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	69.2	51.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	107.7	79.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	155.6	114.9
Real Racing 3	151.4	112.8
Sniper 3D	166.5	122.7
Need for Speed No Limits	105.3	77.4
Mortal Kombat X	108.1	81.3
CSR Racing 2	90.5	67.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7000 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 31
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 1
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 specs and review.