Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Comparisons   29-10-2022
   Full comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 9200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, GFXBench, AnTuTu, Vellamo, and how good the SoCs are in games Call of Duty, Madout2, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, GTA, Fortnite etc.
   After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Dimensity 9200 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus.


 
MediaTek Dimensity 9200
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 920099% MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus98%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 920094% MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus93%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 920099% MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus95%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 9200 MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Total score12682781062639
CPU355109297529
GPU481953403808
MEM202930170016
UX228299191283

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 9200 MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Single-Core14501215
Multi-Core52724417

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 9200 MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Frequency3000 MHz3200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography4 nm5 nm
Transistors count9200 millions8400 millions
Core configuration1x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-X3
3x2.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
4x1.7 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)7 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR5xLPDDR5x
Max. Memory32 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency75007500
Memory bandwidth5252
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB1 MB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache32 MB32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 6% better than Dimensity 9200 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUImmortalis-G715 MC16Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency750 MHz850 MHz
GFloPS32001648
# of Cores1610
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile48.140.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)150.3125.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra90.975.2
Call of Duty: Mobile83.669.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)128.2107.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition185.4155.6
Real Racing 3180.1151.4
Sniper 3D198.7166.5
Need for Speed No Limits125.7105.3
Mortal Kombat X130.3108.1
CSR Racing 2108.290.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution320 MP320 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS240240
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed7500 MBit/s.7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed3100 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationGalileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OFGalileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9200 is better: 26
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 2
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 9200 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile


Dimensity 9200 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985
• Vs Apple A12 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Samsung Exynos 9 9820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200


MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 5
 • Antutu 8
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands