Comparisons 13-07-2022
Detailed comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, Quadrant, and how good the chipsets are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, Madout2 etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus or Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 98% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 93% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 89% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 95% |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | | Total score | 1062639 | 1096026 | | CPU | 163368 | 268491 | | GPU | 139627 | 334895 | | MEM | 106600 | 153388 | | UX | 93142 | 139755 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | | Single-Core | 1215 | 1528 | | Multi-Core | 4417 | 4819 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm | | Transistors count | 8400 millions | 14000 millions | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2
3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710
4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 12 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5x | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 7500 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 52 | 88 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 8 MB | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 32 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 | | GPU Frequency | 850 MHz | 970 MHz | | GFloPS | 1648 | 1800 | | # of Cores | 10 | | | # of Shader Units | | 1024 | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 7680 x 4320 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 64 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 120 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | | Download speed | 7000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 6000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, NavIC, GPS, Beidou, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is better: 20
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
