 |
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus |
|
Comparisons 14-10-2023 Full compare data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus, testing of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough review of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, PCMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, AnTuTu, 3DMark, Quadrant, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, PUBG etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 53% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 76% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 85% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 82% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingHiSilicon KIRIN 9000S | 52% |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | 75% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | Total score | 738244 | 1062639 | CPU | 206711 | 297529 | GPU | 280524 | 403808 | MEM | 118115 | 170016 | UX | 132893 | 191283 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | Single-Core | 1058 | 1215 | Multi-Core | 4040 | 4417 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S |
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus | Frequency | 2620 MHz | 3200 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | 8400 millions | Core configuration | 1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510 | Power consumption (TDP) | 6 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | LPDDR5x | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1600 | 7500 | Memory bandwidth | 44 | 52 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | 1 MB | L2 cache | | 8 MB | L3 cache | | 32 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 18% better than HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Maleoon 910 | Mali-G710 MC10 | GPU Frequency | 750 MHz | 850 MHz | GFloPS | 2056 | 1648 | # of Cores | 4 | 10 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 29.5 | 40.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 87.4 | 125.6 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.4 | 75.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 49.9 | 69.2 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 75.8 | 107.7 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 107.5 | 155.6 | Real Racing 3 | 105.6 | 151.4 | Sniper 3D | 115.4 | 166.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 73.2 | 105.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 77.3 | 108.1 | CSR Racing 2 | 64.6 | 90.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 128 MP | 320 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 48 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Balong 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 7000 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 14000 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 6
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 32 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs Apple M2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|