Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special testing software such as Vellamo, PassMark, Neocore, AnTuTu, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, GFXBench, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of chips in GTA, Madout2, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9 etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to understand which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 778G+ or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 97% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 89% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 778G+ | 92% |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 92% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 778G+ |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Total score | 558996 | 785369 | | CPU | 91177 | 163368 | | GPU | 113501 | 139627 | | MEM | 52158 | 106600 | | UX | 47521 | 93142 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 778G+ |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Single-Core | 868 | 1157 | | Multi-Core | 3157 | 4056 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 778G+ |
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2850 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 4680 millions | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz Kryo 670 Prime
3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 8 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 32 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 6400 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 48 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 64 KB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 640 KB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 16 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is 12% better than Snapdragon 778G+ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G610 MP6 | | GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 600 MHz | | GFloPS | 906.58 | 912 | | # of Cores | | 6 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 200 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 32 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 240 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 4700 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 2500 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GLONASS, GBeidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5 | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 24
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Google Tensor
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
|
