Comparisons 17-05-2022 Full compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Google Tensor, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests like PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, 3DMark, Vellamo, Neocore, PCMark, Geekbench, even the gaming performance of processors in Call of Duty, Fortnite, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Madout2 etc. After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which chip is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8100 or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 97% |
Tensor | 99% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 89% |
Tensor | 84% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 8100 | 92% |
Tensor | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
Tensor | Total score | 785369 | 798643 | CPU | 163368 | 242744 | GPU | 139627 | 264574 | MEM | 106600 | 147863 | UX | 93142 | 128575 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
Tensor | Single-Core | 1157 | 1045 | Multi-Core | 4056 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 8100 |
Tensor | Frequency | 2850 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 5 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 6200 millions | | Core configuration | 4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 8 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 6400 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 48 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 64 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 640 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 16 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is 1% better than Tensor in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 912 | 986 | # of Cores | 6 | 22 | # of Shader Units | | | Display | 2560 x 1440 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | Real Racing 3 | | | Sniper 3D | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | CSR Racing 2 | | | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 240 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5123 | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | Navigation | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5 | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 18 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article. • Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Vs Apple M1 • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists • Benchmarks • PUBG mobile • Fortnite Mobile • Antutu 8 • 3DMark • GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle • Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor • Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor • Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Google Tensor • Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor • Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Google Tensor • HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Google Tensor • MediaTek Dimensity 1050 Vs Google Tensor
|