Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 benchmark which processor is better

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100

Comparisons   08-07-2023
   Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, Vellamo, Quadrant, GFXBench, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, Madout2, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.

 
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
MediaTek Dimensity 8100

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Snapdragon 68521% MediaTek Dimensity 810056%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Snapdragon 68583% MediaTek Dimensity 810083%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Snapdragon 68519% MediaTek Dimensity 810054%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Snapdragon 685 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Total score293373785369
CPU82144219905
GPU111483298431
MEM46936125656
UX52803141372

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Snapdragon 685 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Single-Core4921157
Multi-Core16054056

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Snapdragon 685 MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Frequency2800 MHz2850 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography6 nm5 nm
Transistors count6200 millions
Core configuration8x2.8 GHz Kryo 2654x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)5 W8 W
Memory typeLPDDR4x (Dual Channel)LPDDR5
Max. Memory8 Gb32 Gb
Memory Frequency21336400
Memory bandwidth2248
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache64 KB
L2 cache640 KB
L3 cache16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is 1% better than Snapdragon 685 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency750 MHz600 MHz
GFloPS312912
# of Cores6
# of Shader Units192
Display2520 x 1080 pixels2560 x 1440 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile25.230.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)55.793.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra60.255.2
Call of Duty: Mobile54.451.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)49.179.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition74.6114.9
Real Racing 375.3112.8
Sniper 3D96.7122.7
Need for Speed No Limits96.677.4
Mortal Kombat X96.481.3
CSR Racing 266.567.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution108 MP200 MP
Dual Camera resolution13 MP32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Qualcomm Spectra 365
Video Encoding FPS60240
Video Encoding resolution4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1


Networks and Navigation
ModemQualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed390 MBit/s.4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed150 MBit/s.2500 MBit/s.
NavigationBeidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSSQZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC supportNoYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 is better: 7
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 35
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Snapdragon 685 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Snapdragon 685 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G95
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G96
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G99
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845
• Vs MediaTek Helio G90T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G
• Vs MediaTek Helio G88
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 980
• Vs MediaTek Helio G85
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T612
• Vs MediaTek Helio G80
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T618
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm 215
• Vs Qualcomm 205
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs Rockchip RK3562
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL


MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000C
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands