MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100

Comparisons 22-09-2023

Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra or MediaTek Dimensity 8100.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

56%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

MediaTek Dimensity 8100

54%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Total score	719546	785369
CPU	201463	219905
GPU	273436	298431
MEM	115118	125656
UX	129523	141372

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Single-Core	1059	1157
Multi-Core	3716	4056

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 8100
Frequency	2200 MHz	2850 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	4x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	6400
Memory bandwidth	48	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	64 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	640 KB
L3 cache	1 MB	16 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is 22% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	912	912
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	28.1	30.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	85.5	93.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	55.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	47.1	51.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	73.2	79.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.8	114.9
Real Racing 3	103.1	112.8
Sniper 3D	113.5	122.7
Need for Speed No Limits	62.6	77.4
Mortal Kombat X	82.1	81.3
CSR Racing 2	67.4	67.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, NavIC, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 2
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8100 is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 8100 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 specs and review.