MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Comparisons 08-06-2023

Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software such as Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, Geekbench, GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, and how good the processors are in games Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, GTA, Minecraft etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Dimensity 8300 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8300

74%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

76%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8300

87%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8300

72%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

75%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Total score	1035505	1062639
CPU	289949	297529
GPU	393482	403808
MEM	165670	170016
UX	186390	191283

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Single-Core	1184	1215
Multi-Core	4305	4417

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8300	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Frequency	2800 MHz	3200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8800 millions	8400 millions
Core configuration	1x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A714 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	7500
Memory bandwidth	52	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	8 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	32 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 12% better than Dimensity 8300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G52 MP6	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	426	1648
# of Cores	6	10
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	39.3	40.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	122.6	125.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	73.4	75.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	67.5	69.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	104.9	107.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	151.2	155.6
Real Racing 3	147.5	151.4
Sniper 3D	162.4	166.5
Need for Speed No Limits	102.1	105.3
Mortal Kombat X	105.3	108.1
CSR Racing 2	88.3	90.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300 is better: 5
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 8300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus specs and review.