Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

Comparisons   08-10-2023
   Detailed testing data of Google Tensor G3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like PassMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, Neocore, PCMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Tensor G3 or MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Tensor G3

76%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

76%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Tensor G3

86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

82%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Tensor G3

73%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus

75%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Tensor G3	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Total score	1071317	1062639
CPU	299978	297529
GPU	407100	403808
MEM	171402	170016
UX	192844	191283

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Tensor G3	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Single-Core	1403	1215
Multi-Core	3849	4417

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Tensor G3	MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
Frequency	3000 MHz	3200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count		8400 millions
Core configuration	1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X3 4x2.34 GHz Cortex-A715 4x2.15 GHz Cortex-A510	1x3.2 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	10 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel)	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	3200	7500
Memory bandwidth	51.2	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	8 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is 6% better than Tensor G3 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G715 MP9	Mali-G710 MC10
GPU Frequency	750 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	1354.62	1648
# of Cores	9	10
# of Shader Units
Display	4096 x 2160 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	40.3	40.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	126.1	125.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	76.2	75.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	69.9	69.2
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	109.5	107.7
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	156.3	155.6
Real Racing 3	152.6	151.4
Sniper 3D	166.8	166.5
Need for Speed No Limits	106.8	105.3
Mortal Kombat X	109.7	108.1
CSR Racing 2	91.8	90.5

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	360 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS	60	240
Video Encoding resolution	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10, AV1 BigWave	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Exynos Modem 5223	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	10150 MBit/s.	7000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	9500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Dual frequency GNSS, GPS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, QZSS, GLONASS, GNSS, NavIC, Beidou, SBAS	Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor G3 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus is better: 14
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Tensor G3 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Tensor G3 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus specs and review.