MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Comparisons   18-01-2024
   Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as PCMark, Geekbench, Neocore, PassMark, 3DMark, Quadrant, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of CPUs in PUBG, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra or Kirin 9000E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

50%

Kirin 9000E

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

89%

Kirin 9000E

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

47%

Kirin 9000E

45%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Total score	1087280	678577
CPU	304447	189996
GPU	413163	257866
MEM	173955	108569
UX	195710	122143

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Single-Core	1243	992
Multi-Core	4520	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Frequency	2800 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8800 millions
Core configuration	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	1600
Memory bandwidth	52	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	8 MB
L3 cache	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 10% better than Dimensity 8300-Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615	Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	1064	986
# of Cores	6	22
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	41.7	26.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	128.2	80.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	77.5	48.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	71.2	44.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	111.1	68.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	159.3	100.7
Real Racing 3	154.9	60.9
Sniper 3D	169.8	107.1
Need for Speed No Limits	108.3	87.7
Mortal Kombat X	111.7	70.6
CSR Racing 2	92.6	58.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra is better: 33
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300-Ultra specs and review.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.