Comparisons 22-05-2022
Comprehensive compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the chips, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like AnTuTu, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Geekbench, Quadrant, Neocore, Vellamo, PassMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which chip is better to buy Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 or Kirin 9000E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
Kirin 9000E | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 89% |
Kirin 9000E | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 | 99% |
Kirin 9000E | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000E | | Total score | 1096026 | 678577 | | CPU | 268491 | 216046 | | GPU | 334895 | 227655 | | MEM | 153388 | 126580 | | UX | 139755 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000E | | Single-Core | 1528 | 992 | | Multi-Core | 4819 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 |
Kirin 9000E | | Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3130 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 4 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 14000 millions | | | Core configuration | 1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2
3x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710
4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 12 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 32 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 3200 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 88 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 1 MB | | | L2 cache | 2 MB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is 2% better than Kirin 9000E in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 730 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 970 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 1800 | 986 | | # of Cores | | 22 | | # of Shader Units | 1024 | | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 80.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 100.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 60.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 107.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 87.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 70.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 58.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 64 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 680 | | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X65 Modem-RF System 5G | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 15000 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 6000 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | SBAS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled, NavIC, GPS, Beidou, GNSS, Dual frequency GNSS, GLONASS | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 is better: 25
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 15
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000E
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
