MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Comparisons 18-01-2024

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the technical characteristics, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as Geekbench, Vellamo, GFXBench, Quadrant, PassMark, AnTuTu, 3DMark, PCMark, Neocore, and how good the processors are in games Fortnite, Madout2, Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, Minecraft, PUBG etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra or Dimensity 8300.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

50%

Dimensity 8300

74%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

89%

Dimensity 8300

87%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

47%

Dimensity 8300

72%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Dimensity 8300
Total score	1087280	1035505
CPU	304447	289949
GPU	413163	393482
MEM	173955	165670
UX	195710	186390

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Dimensity 8300
Single-Core	1243	1184
Multi-Core	4520	4305

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	Dimensity 8300
Frequency	2800 MHz	2800 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	4 nm
Transistors count	8800 millions	8800 millions
Core configuration	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X3 3x2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A714 4x1.6 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	7500
Memory bandwidth	52	52
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L2 cache	8 MB	8 MB
L3 cache	32 MB	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615	Mali-G52 MP6
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	850 MHz
GFloPS	1064	426
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		39.3
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)		122.6
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra		73.4
Call of Duty: Mobile		67.5
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)		104.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition		151.2
Real Racing 3		147.5
Sniper 3D		162.4
Need for Speed No Limits		102.1
Mortal Kombat X		105.3
CSR Racing 2		88.3

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	320 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC	NavIC, GPS L1CA+L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra is better: 8
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300 is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300-Ultra specs and review.

Dimensity 8300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300 specs and review.