MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Comparisons 31-08-2022

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Kompanio 820 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the technical characteristics of the CPUs, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests such as Geekbench, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, GFXBench, PCMark, Neocore, PassMark, AnTuTu, even the gaming performance of processors in PUBG, Asphalt 9, Madout2, Minecraft, Call of Duty, Fortnite, GTA etc.
After looking at the data of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Kompanio 820 or Kirin 9000E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Kompanio 820

31%

Kirin 9000E

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Kompanio 820

78%

Kirin 9000E

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Kompanio 820

29%

Kirin 9000E

45%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	Kirin 9000E
Total score	434348	678577
CPU	121620	189996
GPU	165046	257866
MEM	69495	108569
UX	78182	122143

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	Kirin 9000E
Single-Core	662	992
Multi-Core	2622	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Kompanio 820	Kirin 9000E
Frequency	2200 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	7 nm	5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	4x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR4x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	16 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	2133	1600
Memory bandwidth	24	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.4-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 29% better than MediaTek Kompanio 820 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G57 MP5	Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	705.5	986
# of Cores	5	22
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.6	26.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	54.7	80.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	56.9	48.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	41.4	44.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	48.3	68.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	73.9	100.7
Real Racing 3	71.5	60.9
Sniper 3D	124.7	107.1
Need for Speed No Limits	79.4	87.7
Mortal Kombat X	81.6	70.6
CSR Racing 2	62.7	58.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	32 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	16 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	2770 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	1800 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	No	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Kompanio 820 is better: 10
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 26
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Kompanio 820 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Kompanio 820 specs and review.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.