MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

Comparisons 18-01-2024

Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the processors, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests such as AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, Quadrant, PassMark, PCMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the SoCs are in games Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which chipset is better to buy Dimensity 8300-Ultra or MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

50%

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

29%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

89%

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

84%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

47%

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus

26%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Total score	1087280	410676
CPU	304447	114994
GPU	413163	156066
MEM	173955	65705
UX	195710	73931

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Single-Core	1243	829
Multi-Core	4520	2023

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
Frequency	2800 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	8800 millions
Core configuration	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A76 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	2133
Memory bandwidth	52	17.07
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	8 MB
L3 cache	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8300-Ultra is 21% better than MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615	Mali-G57 MC2
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	950 MHz
GFloPS	1064	486
# of Cores	6	2
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile		30.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)		46.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra		56.3
Call of Duty: Mobile		39.9
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)		37.3
Minecraft: Pocket Edition		56.1
Real Racing 3		70.6
Sniper 3D		106.1
Need for Speed No Limits		67.8
Mortal Kombat X		64.1
CSR Racing 2		73.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	108 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	3GPP R16 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	3300 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	1500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+L5, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1+E5a, BeiDou B1I+B2a, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra is better: 28
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus is better: 13
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300-Ultra specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus specs and review.