Comparisons 20-05-2022
Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in software tests like Neocore, AnTuTu, PCMark, Vellamo, Quadrant, Geekbench, GFXBench, PassMark, 3DMark, even the gaming performance of chips in PUBG, Madout2, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Call of Duty, GTA etc.
After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 1300 or Kirin 9000E.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 96% |
Kirin 9000E | 98% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 88% |
Kirin 9000E | 93% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | 92% |
Kirin 9000E | 91% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Kirin 9000E | | Total score | 801200 | 678577 | | CPU | 163368 | 216046 | | GPU | 139627 | 227655 | | MEM | 106600 | 126580 | | UX | 93142 | 107532 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Kirin 9000E | | Single-Core | 1455 | 992 | | Multi-Core | 4766 | 3714 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 |
Kirin 9000E | | Frequency | 3000 MHz | 3130 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5800 millions | | | Core configuration | 2x3.0GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 1x3
13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 6 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x | LPDDR5, LPDDR4x | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 1600 | | Memory bandwidth | 32 | 44 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | | | L2 cache | 320 KB | | | L3 cache | 8 MB | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 4% better than MediaTek Dimensity 1300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 504 | 986 | | # of Cores | 9 | 22 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | 26.7 | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | 80.3 | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | 48.7 | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | 44.1 | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | 68.9 | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | 100.7 | | Real Racing 3 | | 60.9 | | Sniper 3D | | 107.1 | | Need for Speed No Limits | | 87.7 | | Mortal Kombat X | | 70.6 | | CSR Racing 2 | | 58.4 |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 200 MP | 128 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 32 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264, H.265/HEVC |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Balong 5G | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 15000 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 14000 MBit/s. | | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5 | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1300 is better: 12
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 28
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Apple M1
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Apple M1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Snapdragon 875 Vs Kirin 9000E
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
|
