MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Comparisons 19-05-2022

Detailed compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, examination of graphics processors (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications such as Vellamo, Neocore, Quadrant, AnTuTu, PassMark, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, GFXBench, even the gaming performance of SoCs in Fortnite, PUBG, Call of Duty, GTA, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, Madout2 etc.
After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 9000 or Kirin 9000E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

73%

Kirin 9000E

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

82%

Kirin 9000E

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

72%

Kirin 9000E

45%

Antutu 8

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	Kirin 9000E
Total score	1021474	678577
CPU	286017	189996
GPU	388151	257866
MEM	163439	108569
UX	183864	122143

GeekBench 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	Kirin 9000E
Single-Core	1168	992
Multi-Core	4246	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 9000	Kirin 9000E
Frequency	3050 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8400 millions
Core configuration	1x3.05 GHz ARM Cortex-X2 3x2.85 GHz ARM Cortex-A710 4x1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	1600
Memory bandwidth	52	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1024 KB
L3 cache	32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 2% better than MediaTek Dimensity 9000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G710 MC10	Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency	850 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	1648	986
# of Cores	10	22
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	39.1	26.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.4	80.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.1	48.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.2	44.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.1	68.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.2	100.7
Real Racing 3	145.8	60.9
Sniper 3D	159.2	107.1
Need for Speed No Limits	101.4	87.7
Mortal Kombat X	104.2	70.6
CSR Racing 2	87.8	58.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	7000 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, GPS L1CA+L5, QZSS L1CA+ L5, NavIC, Galileo E1 + E5a, Glonass L1OF	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 9000 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 7
Please note that you do not need to blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 9000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 specs and review.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu 8
• GeekBench 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.