HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Comparisons   11-03-2021
   Well, which chip or processor is better? Full data of speed tests and benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, compare of GPUs Adreno 620 and Mali-G78 MP22.
   This performance comparison includes two processors: Kirin 9000E is octa-core (ARM Cortex-A77) and Snapdragon 765G is octa-core (Kryo 475 Prime). Both processors went through battery life test and power consumption test. A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to read, is made by the table.
   From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel benchmarking in synthetic type tests such as WebXPRT 3, Geekbench, Mozilla Kraken, Vellamo, GFXBench, AnTuTu 8, Neocore, PCMark, PassMark, Quadrant, 3DMark, Octane V2, and how good the processors are in games PUBG, Sniper 3D, Real Racing 3, Garena Free Fire - The Cobra, Mortal Kombat, Call of Duty: Mobile, Fortnite, Minecraft Bedrock etc.
   After looking at the data these benchmarks and videos, you already be able to understand which SoCs is better to buy Kirin 9000E or Snapdragon 765G and which chip is better for gaming: CSR Racing 2, Madout2, Need for Speed No Limits, Asphalt 9.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Kirin 9000E

48%

Snapdragon 765G

21%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Kirin 9000E

78%

Snapdragon 765G

74%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Kirin 9000E

45%

Snapdragon 765G

19%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Kirin 9000E	Snapdragon 765G
Total score	678577	304160
CPU	189996	85154
GPU	257866	115588
MEM	108569	48671
UX	122143	54738

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Kirin 9000E	Snapdragon 765G
Single-Core	992	681
Multi-Core	3714	2316

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Kirin 9000E	Snapdragon 765G
Frequency	3130 MHz	2400 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x2.4 GHz Kryo 475 Prime 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x (Dual Channel)
Max. Memory	16 Gb	12 Gb
Memory Frequency	1600	2133
Memory bandwidth	44	17
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache
L2 cache
L3 cache
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8.2-A	ARMv8.3-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 23% better than Snapdragon 765G in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G78 MP22	Adreno 620
GPU Frequency	650 MHz	750 MHz
GFloPS	986	896
# of Cores	22
# of Shader Units		384
Display	2560 x 1600 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	26.7	31.5
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	80.3	55.1
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	48.7	62.5
Call of Duty: Mobile	44.1	40.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	68.9	51.8
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	100.7	75.6
Real Racing 3	60.9	93.8
Sniper 3D	107.1	137.5
Need for Speed No Limits	87.7	112.5
Mortal Kombat X	70.6	100
CSR Racing 2	58.4	75

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	128 MP	192 MP
Dual Camera resolution	48 MP	22 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 355
Video Encoding FPS	60	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Balong 5G	Qualcomm Snapdragon X52 Modem-RF System
Download speed	15000 MBit/s.	3700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	14000 MBit/s.	1600 MBit/s.
Navigation	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 26
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G is better: 12
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. You can watch benchmark video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets Kirin 9000E and Snapdragon 765G, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.

Snapdragon 765G SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Snapdragon 765G specs and review.