Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 benchmark which processor is better

MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000

Comparisons   18-01-2024
   Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in synthetic type tests such as GFXBench, 3DMark, Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, Neocore, PCMark, even the gaming performance of chipsets in Call of Duty, Asphalt 9, GTA, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra or Kirin 8000.


 
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
HiSilicon Kirin 8000

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
Dimensity 8300-Ultra50% Kirin 800030%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
Dimensity 8300-Ultra89% Kirin 800086%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
Dimensity 8300-Ultra47% Kirin 800027%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
Dimensity 8300-Ultra Kirin 8000
Total score1087280659883
CPU304447184769
GPU413163250747
MEM173955105574
UX195710118769

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
Dimensity 8300-Ultra Kirin 8000
Single-Core1243945
Multi-Core45203611

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
Dimensity 8300-Ultra Kirin 8000
Frequency2800 MHz2200 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography4 nm5 nm
Transistors count8800 millions
Core configuration4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
1x2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)7 W6 W
Memory typeLPDDR5xLPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory32 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency75001600
Memory bandwidth5244
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB
L2 cache8 MB
L3 cache32 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8300-Ultra is 21% better than Kirin 8000 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMali-G615Maleoon 910
GPU Frequency700 MHz750 MHz
GFloPS10642056
# of Cores64
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1440 pixels2560 x 1600 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile30.6
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)74.9
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra103.6
Call of Duty: Mobile57.7
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)64.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition94.6
Real Racing 3128.5
Sniper 3D165.8
Need for Speed No Limits144.2
Mortal Kombat X118.7
CSR Racing 2144.5
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution320 MP128 MP
Dual Camera resolution64 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS24060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1H.264, H.265/HEVC


Networks and Navigation
ModemSub 6GHz 5G Multi-ModeBalong 5G
Download speed7500 MBit/s.15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed2500 MBit/s.14000 MBit/s.
NavigationGlonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavICGPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportYesNo


Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra is better: 22
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 8000 is better: 18
   Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint comparison and hear what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both chipsets, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Kirin 8000 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC Comparisons
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2000
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280


Kirin 8000 SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Google Tensor
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs Apple A13 Bionic
• Vs Samsung Exynos 990
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands