MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E

Comparisons   29-10-2024
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Quadrant, PCMark, AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, GFXBench, and how good the processors are in games GTA, Asphalt 9, Fortnite, Minecraft, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2 etc.
   After reading the results of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which processors is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra or Kirin 9000E.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

47%

Kirin 9000E

48%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

84%

Kirin 9000E

78%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

44%

Kirin 9000E

45%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Total score	1024044	678577
CPU	286722	189996
GPU	389132	257866
MEM	163842	108569
UX	184337	122143

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Single-Core	1253	992
Multi-Core	4256	3714

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra	Kirin 9000E
Frequency	3100 MHz	3130 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8600 millions
Core configuration	1x3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 3x3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	1x3 13 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 3x2.54 GHz ARM Cortex-A77 4x2.06 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	6 W	6 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5, LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	1600
Memory bandwidth	51	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB
L2 cache	2 MB
L3 cache	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Kirin 9000E is 0% better than MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G610 MP6	Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency	600 MHz	650 MHz
GFloPS	912	986
# of Cores	6	22
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1600 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	38.4	26.7
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	121.7	80.3
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	72.2	48.7
Call of Duty: Mobile	66.7	44.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	103.9	68.9
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	149.1	100.7
Real Racing 3	145.2	60.9
Sniper 3D	160.3	107.1
Need for Speed No Limits	100.3	87.7
Mortal Kombat X	104.7	70.6
CSR Racing 2	87.2	58.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	128 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)	Imagiq 785 ISP
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Balong 5G
Download speed	4700 MBit/s.	15000 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2750 MBit/s.	14000 MBit/s.
Navigation	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	No

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is better: 31
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon Kirin 9000E is better: 8
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra specs and review.

Kirin 9000E SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• 3DMark
• Antutu v10
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Kirin 9000E specs and review.