MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

Comparisons   18-01-2024
   Detailed testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, comparison of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the technical characteristics, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, 3DMark, PassMark, Neocore, GFXBench, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Geekbench, PCMark, and how good the CPUs are in games Fortnite, GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra or MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

50%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

51%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

89%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

86%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

Dimensity 8300-Ultra

47%

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra

49%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Total score	1087280	719546
CPU	304447	201463
GPU	413163	273436
MEM	173955	115118
UX	195710	129523

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Single-Core	1243	1059
Multi-Core	4520	3716

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	Dimensity 8300-Ultra	MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
Frequency	2800 MHz	2200 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	4 nm	5 nm
Transistors count	8800 millions	6200 millions
Core configuration	4x2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A510	2x2.9 GHz ARM Cortex-A715 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A510
Power consumption (TDP)	7 W	8 W
Memory type	LPDDR5x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	32 Gb
Memory Frequency	7500	6400
Memory bandwidth	52	48
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	1 MB	128 KB
L2 cache	8 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	32 MB	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Dimensity 8300-Ultra is 21% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615	Mali-G610 MP6
GPU Frequency	700 MHz	600 MHz
GFloPS	1064	912
# of Cores	6	6
# of Shader Units
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2560 x 1440 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	41.7	28.1
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	128.2	85.5
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	77.5	51.1
Call of Duty: Mobile	71.2	47.1
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	111.1	73.2
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	159.3	106.8
Real Racing 3	154.9	103.1
Sniper 3D	169.8	113.5
Need for Speed No Limits	108.3	62.6
Mortal Kombat X	111.7	82.1
CSR Racing 2	92.6	67.4

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	320 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	64 MP	32 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	7500 MBit/s.	4700 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2500 MBit/s.	2500 MBit/s.
Navigation	Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC	Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, Galileo E1 + E5a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra is better: 32
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra is better: 1
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel testing and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, as well as read the test results at the links below.

Dimensity 8300-Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• Dimensity 8300-Ultra specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra specs and review.