Comparisons 27-05-2022
Comprehensive comparison data of MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs Google Tensor, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like PassMark, GFXBench, Neocore, 3DMark, PCMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, Quadrant, Geekbench, and how good the SoCs are in games Fortnite, Madout2, PUBG, Minecraft, Asphalt 9, GTA, Call of Duty etc.
After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which CPU is better to buy Dimensity 1050 or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Dimensity 1050 | 87% |
Tensor | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Dimensity 1050 | 83% |
Tensor | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Dimensity 1050 | 96% |
Tensor | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Dimensity 1050 |
Tensor | | Total score | 574847 | 798643 | | CPU | 163368 | 242744 | | GPU | 139627 | 264574 | | MEM | 106600 | 147863 | | UX | 93142 | 128575 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Dimensity 1050 |
Tensor | | Single-Core | 1223 | 1045 | | Multi-Core | 3794 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Dimensity 1050 |
Tensor | | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 5600 millions | | | Core configuration | 4x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 9 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4266 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 29 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 32 KB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 320 KB | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 8 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor is 10% better than Dimensity 1050 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 600 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 1008 | 986 | | # of Cores | 3 | 22 | | # of Shader Units | | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 108 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 20 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 4700 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 2500 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | BeiDou B1I+ B2a, GPS L1CA+L5, NavIC, QZSS L1CA+ L5, Glonass L1OF, Galileo E1 + E5a | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 1050 is better: 9
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 18
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Google Tensor
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Google Tensor
|
