 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Google Tensor |
|
Comparisons 28-02-2023 Full compare data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 vs Google Tensor, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the technical characteristics of the SoCs, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, 3DMark, Geekbench, PCMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, PassMark, AnTuTu, and how good the chipsets are in games Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite etc. After looking at the data these tests and videos, you can already make an informed decision about which processors is better to buy Snapdragon 850 or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 850 | 20% |
Tensor | 57% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 850 | 65% |
Tensor | 81% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 850 | 19% |
Tensor | 56% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 850 |
Tensor | Total score | 282308 | 798643 | CPU | 79039 | 223623 | GPU | 107274 | 303478 | MEM | 45171 | 127772 | UX | 50815 | 143757 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 850 |
Tensor | Single-Core | 638 | 1045 | Multi-Core | 2236 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 850 |
Tensor | Frequency | 2960 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 8x2.96 GHz Kryo 385 | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1 2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 10 W | 10 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | Memory Frequency | 1866 | 3200 | Memory bandwidth | 34.1 | 51.2 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 384 KB | 1 MB | L2 cache | 768 KB | 2 MB | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.1-A | ARMv8.2-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 850 is 5% better than Tensor in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 630 | Mali-G78 MP22 | GPU Frequency | 650 MHz | 650 MHz | GFloPS | 712 | 986 | # of Cores | | 22 | # of Shader Units | 512 | | Display | 2560 x 1600 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 26.7 | 31.4 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 45.6 | 94.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 44.8 | 56.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 38.2 | 52.6 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 35.4 | 80.6 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 59.4 | 116.7 | Real Racing 3 | 56.4 | 113.9 | Sniper 3D | 98.2 | 124.5 | Need for Speed No Limits | 62.2 | 79.3 | Mortal Kombat X | 71.4 | 82.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 49.3 | 68.3 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 32 MP | 240 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 48 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 280 | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X20 LTE modem | Exynos Modem 5123 | Download speed | 1200 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 150 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | Navigation | GPS, Galileo, Glonass, Beidou, QZSS, SBAS | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | NFC support | No | Yes | 5G support | No | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 is better: 4
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 34 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both chips think, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 850 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 • Vs MediaTek Helio G70 • Vs Apple A11 Bionic • Vs Unisoc Tiger T700 • Vs Apple A10 Fusion • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 500 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T610 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990E • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 • Vs MediaTek Helio P90 • Vs MediaTek Helio P60 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 970 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T616 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 • Vs MediaTek Helio P70 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T606 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 710 • Vs MediaTek Helio G37 • Vs Samsung Exynos 850 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Helio G36 • Vs Unisoc SC9863A1 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
Tensor SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Google Tensor Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
| |
|