Mobile chips SoC and desktop processors CPU GPU - all information
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor benchmark which processor is better

HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor

Comparisons   14-10-2023
   Full compare data of HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S vs Google Tensor, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications, so that it can be easier to understand, is made by the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in special test applications like Vellamo, Geekbench, 3DMark, Quadrant, Neocore, GFXBench, AnTuTu, PCMark, PassMark, and how good the processors are in games Madout2, GTA, Fortnite, Call of Duty, PUBG, Asphalt 9, Minecraft etc.
   After reading the results of all tests and videos, you already be able to figure out which SoCs is better to buy HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S or Tensor.

 
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S
Google Tensor

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S53% Tensor57%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S85% Tensor81%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S52% Tensor56%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor
Total score738244798643
CPU206711223623
GPU280524303478
MEM118115127772
UX132893143757

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor
Single-Core10581045
Multi-Core40402869

Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S Tensor
Frequency2620 MHz2800 MHz
Cores88
Bit6464
Lithography5 nm5 nm
Transistors count
Core configuration1x2.62 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
3x2.15 GHz ARM Cortex-A77
4x1.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)6 W10 W
Memory typeLPDDR5, LPDDR4xLPDDR5 (Quad Channel)
Max. Memory16 Gb16 Gb
Memory Frequency16003200
Memory bandwidth4451.2
Neural Processor (NPU)YesYes
L1 cache1 MB
L2 cache2 MB
L3 cache8 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)ARMv8.2-AARMv8.2-A
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor is 6% better than HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media
GPUMaleoon 910Mali-G78 MP22
GPU Frequency750 MHz650 MHz
GFloPS2056986
# of Cores422
# of Shader Units
Display2560 x 1600 pixels4096 x 2160 pixels
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark
Fortnite Mobile29.531.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)87.494.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra51.456.1
Call of Duty: Mobile49.952.6
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)75.880.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition107.5116.7
Real Racing 3105.6113.9
Sniper 3D115.4124.5
Need for Speed No Limits73.279.3
Mortal Kombat X77.382.4
CSR Racing 264.668.3
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras
Camera resolution128 MP240 MP
Dual Camera resolution48 MP48 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP
Video Encoding FPS6060
Video Encoding resolution4K, 2K, FullHD8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec supportH.264, H.265/HEVCDolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10


Networks and Navigation
ModemBalong 5GExynos Modem 5123
Download speed15000 MBit/s.7350 MBit/s.
Upload speed14000 MBit/s.3670 MBit/s.
NavigationGPS, Galileo, Glonass, BeidouBeidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo
NFC supportYesYes
5G supportNoYes


Result:
The number of parameters for which HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S is better: 8
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 27
   You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the automatic comparison of the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
Tensor SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile


HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S SoC Comparisons
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Apple M1
• Vs Apple A12Z Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1080
• Vs Apple A12X Bionic
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs Apple A14 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1280
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra


Tensor SoC Comparisons
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
• Vs Samsung Exynos 2200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max
• Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
• Vs Apple A16 Bionic
• Vs Apple A15 Bionic
• Google Tensor Vs Google Tensor G2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra
• Vs Apple M2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
• Vs Qualcomm QCM6490
• Vs Qualcomm QCS8250
• Vs Qualcomm QCS7230
• Vs Qualcomm QCS6490
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1330
• Vs Samsung Exynos 1380
• Vs Apple A17 Bionic
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus
• Vs MediaTek MT8188J
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T820
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T760
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra
• Vs Google Tensor G3
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2
• Vs Unisoc Tiger T603
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL
• Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra
Categories
 • GPU Benchmark  New
 • Comparisons Add
 • Devices lists
 • Benchmarks
 • PUBG mobile
 • Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU comparisons
 • GPU Fortnite Mobile
 • GPU PUBG mobile
 • GPU Benchmarks
 • GPU Devices lists
 • GPU SoCs lists
 • Processor comparisons Add
 • Cinebench r15
 • Cinebench r20
 • Cinebench r23
 • GeekBench 6
 • Antutu v10
 • 3DMark
 • GeekBench 6, 5 mobile
 • Fortnite CPU
 • Roblox CPU
 • Valorant CPU
 • Cyberpunk 2077 CPU
 • Apex Legends CPU
 • Call of Duty: Warzone CPU
 • Overwatch CPU
 • Red Dead Redemption 2 CPU
 • DOOM Eternal CPU
 • Assassin's Creed CPU
 • GTA 5 CPU
 • PUBG CPU
 • GPU list
 • Processor list
Mobile SoC Brands
Processor Brands