Comparisons 22-05-2022
Detailed testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ vs Google Tensor, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A thorough analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is made by the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special testing software like Geekbench, PassMark, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Neocore, Quadrant, Vellamo, 3DMark, PCMark, even the gaming performance of processors in Minecraft, Call of Duty, Madout2, GTA, Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite etc.
After reading the results these tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy Snapdragon 778G+ or Tensor.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score| Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
Tensor | 99% |
Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)| Snapdragon 778G+ | 98% |
Tensor | 84% |
Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming| Snapdragon 778G+ | 92% |
Tensor | 94% |
Antutu 8Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 778G+ |
Tensor | | Total score | 558996 | 798643 | | CPU | 91177 | 242744 | | GPU | 113501 | 264574 | | MEM | 52158 | 147863 | | UX | 47521 | 128575 |
GeekBench 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 778G+ |
Tensor | | Single-Core | 868 | 1045 | | Multi-Core | 3157 | 2869 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 778G+ |
Tensor | | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2800 MHz | | Cores | 8 | 8 | | Bit | 64 | 64 | | Lithography | 6 nm | 5 nm | | Transistors count | 4680 millions | | | Core configuration | 1x2.5 GHz Kryo 670 Prime
3x2.2 GHz Kryo 670 Gold
4x1.9 GHz Kryo 670 Silver | 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-X1
2x2.26 GHz Cortex-A76
4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 | | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 10 W | | Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 16 Gb | | Memory Frequency | 4666 | 3200 | | Memory bandwidth | 17 | 51.2 | | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | | L1 cache | 512 KB | 1 MB | | L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | | L3 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.3-A | ARMv8.2-A |
In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Tensor is 10% better than Snapdragon 778G+ in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and Media| GPU | Adreno 642L | Mali-G78 MP22 | | GPU Frequency | 550 MHz | 650 MHz | | GFloPS | 906.58 | 986 | | # of Cores | | 22 | | # of Shader Units | 512 | | | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 4096 x 2160 pixels |
The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmark| Fortnite Mobile | | | | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | | | | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | | | | Call of Duty: Mobile | | | | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | | | | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | | | | Real Racing 3 | | | | Sniper 3D | | | | Need for Speed No Limits | | | | Mortal Kombat X | | | | CSR Racing 2 | | |
The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu 8 and GeekBench 5.2 becnmarks.
Cameras| Camera resolution | 192 MP | 240 MP | | Dual Camera resolution | 36 MP | 48 MP | | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 570L | Hybrid Exynos + Google ISP | | Video Encoding FPS | 60 | 60 | | Video Encoding resolution | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | | Codec support | HDR10+, HDR10, HLG, H.264 (AVC), H.265 (HEVC), VP8, VP9 | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 |
Networks and Navigation| Modem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X53 Modem-RF System 5G | Exynos Modem 5123 | | Download speed | 3700 MBit/s. | 7350 MBit/s. | | Upload speed | 1600 MBit/s. | 3670 MBit/s. | | Navigation | GLONASS, GBeidou, GPS, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC enabled | Beidou, NavIC, GNSS, GPS, NavIC enabled, QZSS, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Galileo | | NFC support | Yes | Yes | | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ is better: 7
The number of parameters for which Google Tensor is better: 21
You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of joint comparison and hear what people say who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875
• Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
• Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu 8
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 5 mobile
CPU Versus Battle
• Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• Samsung Exynos 2200 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 1300 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Dimensity 8000 Vs Google Tensor
• Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 Vs Google Tensor
• MediaTek Kompanio 1300T Vs Google Tensor
• Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max Vs Google Tensor
• HiSilicon Kirin 9000L Vs Google Tensor
|
