MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025, examination of graphics chips (GPU). A thorough review of all the specifications of the SoCs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the comparison video, you can get the results of parallel examination in synthetic type tests like Quadrant, PassMark, Vellamo, AnTuTu, PCMark, Geekbench, 3DMark, GFXBench, Neocore, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Fortnite, GTA, PUBG, Call of Duty, Madout2, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you already be able to understand which CPU is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 or MediaTek Dimensity 7025.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

33%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

24%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

87%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

83%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

31%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

22%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Total score	733937	530286
CPU	205502	148477
GPU	278895	201504
MEM	117429	84843
UX	132099	95447

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Single-Core	1080	850
Multi-Core	3790	2957

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	MediaTek Dimensity 7025
Frequency	2500 MHz	2500 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	6 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	7 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR4x, LPDDR5
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2133
Memory bandwidth	48	24
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB
L2 cache	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.4-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	IMG BXM-8-256
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	800 MHz
GFloPS	1856	256
# of Cores	6	8
# of Shader Units		256
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	2520 x 1080 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.7	25.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	86.2	54.4
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	51.3
Call of Duty: Mobile	49.4	53.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	75.5	43.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.2	68.5
Real Racing 3	104.5	103.8
Sniper 3D	114.3	114.5
Need for Speed No Limits	72.6	83.7
Mortal Kombat X	76.5	59.7
CSR Racing 2	64.8	62.6

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	200 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	16 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)
Video Encoding FPS	240	240
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	4K, 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264, H.265/HEVC

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	5G Multi-Mode
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	2770 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	1500 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5	Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5
NFC support	Yes	No
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 31
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 8
You need to understand that you should not sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of joint testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both SoCs, and also read the test results on the links under the article.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 specs and review.

MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7025 specs and review.