MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm QCS8250

Comparisons   28-10-2024
   Comprehensive testing data of MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm QCS8250, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful analysis of all the specifications of the processors, so that it can be easier to read, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like Neocore, PassMark, Geekbench, AnTuTu, GFXBench, Quadrant, PCMark, 3DMark, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Minecraft, Call of Duty, GTA, Madout2, Fortnite, PUBG, Asphalt 9 etc.
   After looking at the data of joint tests and videos, you already be able to know which chipset is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7300 or QCS8250.

Summary benchmark results

As a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors
CPU Benchmark
Based on Antutu and Geekbench score

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

33%

QCS8250

49%

Battery life test
Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

87%

QCS8250

77%

Gaming performance
Which CPU is better for gaming

MediaTek Dimensity 7300

31%

QCS8250

48%

Antutu v10, 9

Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	QCS8250
Total score	733937	683050
CPU	205502	191262
GPU	278895	259548
MEM	117429	109285
UX	132099	122956

GeekBench 6, 5.2

This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	QCS8250
Single-Core	1080	1073
Multi-Core	3790	3756

Comparison of specifications

CPU and Memory

	MediaTek Dimensity 7300	QCS8250
Frequency	2500 MHz	2850 MHz
Cores	8	8
Bit	64	64
Lithography	5 nm	7 nm
Transistors count	6200 millions
Core configuration	2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55	4x2.85 GHz Kryo 585 Gold 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 585 Silver
Power consumption (TDP)	8 W	10 W
Memory type	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x	LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x
Max. Memory	32 Gb	16 Gb
Memory Frequency	6400	2750
Memory bandwidth	48	44
Neural Processor (NPU)	Yes	Yes
L1 cache	128 KB	512 KB
L2 cache	1 MB	1 MB
L3 cache	1 MB	4 MB
Instruction set architecture (ISA)	ARMv8-A	ARMv8.2-A

In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here QCS8250 is 12% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.

GPU and Media

GPU	Mali-G615 MC2	Adreno 650
GPU Frequency	1100 MHz	645 MHz
GFloPS	1856	1348
# of Cores	6
# of Shader Units		512
Display	2560 x 1440 pixels	3840 x 2160 pixels

The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.

Gaming benchmark

Fortnite Mobile	29.7	26.4
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile)	86.2	82.7
Garena Free Fire - The Cobra	51.1	49.2
Call of Duty: Mobile	49.4	44.4
Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile)	75.5	69.6
Minecraft: Pocket Edition	106.2	101.5
Real Racing 3	104.5	86.5
Sniper 3D	114.3	64.9
Need for Speed No Limits	72.6	59.2
Mortal Kombat X	76.5	65.3
CSR Racing 2	64.8	60.9

The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.

Cameras

Camera resolution	200 MP	64 MP
Dual Camera resolution	32 MP	64 MP
Image Signal Processor (ISP)		Qualcomm Spectra 480
Video Encoding FPS	240	60
Video Encoding resolution	4K, 2K, FullHD	8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD
Codec support	H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1	H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10

Networks and Navigation

Modem	Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode	Qualcomm Snapdragon X55 Modem-RF System 5G
Download speed	3270 MBit/s.	7500 MBit/s.
Upload speed	2250 MBit/s.	3000 MBit/s.
Navigation	QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5	GPS, GNSS, SBAS, Galileo, Beidou, Dual frequency GNSS, NavIC enabled, GLONASS, QZSS
NFC support	Yes	Yes
5G support	Yes	Yes

Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 29
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm QCS8250 is better: 10
Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison on the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.

MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• MediaTek Dimensity 7300 specs and review.

QCS8250 SoC - all data

• Devices lists
• Benchmarks
• PUBG mobile
• Fortnite Mobile
• Antutu v10
• 3DMark
• GeekBench 6, 5 mobile

• QCS8250 specs and review.