|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 |
|
Comparisons 01-11-2024 Comprehensive testing data of Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300, compare of graphics processors (GPU). A careful review of all the specifications, to make it easier to understand, is presented in the form of the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in special test applications such as 3DMark, Quadrant, AnTuTu, Neocore, Geekbench, PCMark, PassMark, GFXBench, Vellamo, even the gaming performance of CPUs in Asphalt 9, PUBG, Fortnite, Madout2, Minecraft, GTA, Call of Duty etc. After reading the results of parallel tests and videos, you can already make an briefed decision about which SoCs is better to buy Snapdragon 8 Elite or MediaTek Dimensity 7300.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreSnapdragon 8 Elite | 100% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 33% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)Snapdragon 8 Elite | 88% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 87% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingSnapdragon 8 Elite | 98% |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | 31% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Total score | 3123644 | 733937 | CPU | 874624 | 205502 | GPU | 1186984 | 278895 | MEM | 499774 | 117429 | UX | 562252 | 132099 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Single-Core | 3395 | 1080 | Multi-Core | 10489 | 3790 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | Snapdragon 8 Elite |
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Frequency | 4320 MHz | 2500 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 3 nm | 5 nm | Transistors count | 14000 millions | 6200 millions | Core configuration | 2x4.32 GHz Oryon (Phoenix L) 6x3.53 GHz Oryon (Phoenix M) | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | Power consumption (TDP) | 5 W | 8 W | Memory type | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel) | LPDDR5 (Quad Channel), LPDDR4x | Max. Memory | 64 Gb | 32 Gb | Memory Frequency | 5300 | 6400 | Memory bandwidth | 92 | 48 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | 4 MB | 128 KB | L2 cache | 8 MB | 1 MB | L3 cache | 32 MB | 1 MB | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 8 Elite is 42% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7300 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | Adreno 830 | Mali-G615 MC2 | GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 1100 MHz | GFloPS | 3382 | 1856 | # of Cores | | 6 | # of Shader Units | 3072 | | Display | 7680 x 4320 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 116.6 | 29.7 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 372.6 | 86.2 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 220.1 | 51.1 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 205.1 | 49.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 314.4 | 75.5 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 454.5 | 106.2 | Real Racing 3 | 444.4 | 104.5 | Sniper 3D | 485.2 | 114.3 | Need for Speed No Limits | 309.7 | 72.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 321.3 | 76.5 | CSR Racing 2 | 265.5 | 64.8 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 320 MP | 200 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 240 MP | 32 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | Qualcomm Spectra 770 | | Video Encoding FPS | 120 | 240 | Video Encoding resolution | 8K, 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | 4K, 2K, FullHD | Codec support | Dolby Vision, H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, HDR10+, HLG, HDR10 | H.264, H.265/HEVC, AV1 |
Networks and NavigationModem | Qualcomm Snapdragon X80 Modem-RF System 5G | Sub 6GHz 5G Multi-Mode | Download speed | 10000 MBit/s. | 3270 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 3500 MBit/s. | 2250 MBit/s. | Navigation | GNSS, QZSS, GPS, NavIC, Galileo, Dual frequency GNSS, SBAS, GLONASS, Beidou, NavIC enabled | QZSS L1CA+ L5, Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a + B1C, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, GPS L1CA+L5 | NFC support | Yes | Yes | 5G support | Yes | Yes |
Result:
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite is better: 36
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7300 is better: 4 You need to understand that you should not blindly trust the software comparison on the table. You can watch video from beginning to end of parallel testing and listen to what people think who really appreciated the capabilities of both processors, as well as read the test results at the links below.
Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 SoC Comparisons • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Google Tensor • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs Apple M1 • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A12Z Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 875 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Pro • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 895 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 898 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs Qualcomm QCS8250 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E • Vs Samsung Exynos 2100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs Qualcomm QCS7230 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2000 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs Qualcomm QCM6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs Qualcomm QCM5430 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7025 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
| |
|