|
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 |
|
Comparisons 28-10-2024 Comprehensive compare data of MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685, testing of graphics chips (GPU). A step-by-step analysis of all the specifications of the CPUs, to make it easier to read, is summarized in the table. From the video comparison, you can get the results of joint testing in software tests like GFXBench, PCMark, 3DMark, Neocore, PassMark, Vellamo, Geekbench, Quadrant, AnTuTu, and how good the CPUs are in games GTA, Madout2, Minecraft, Fortnite, Asphalt 9, Call of Duty, PUBG etc. After looking at the data of all tests and videos, you already be able to know which SoCs is better to buy MediaTek Dimensity 7025 or Snapdragon 685.
Summary benchmark resultsAs a percentage of the maximum value based on a sample from the entire base of all processors CPU Benchmark Based on Antutu and Geekbench scoreMediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 24% |
Snapdragon 685 | 21% |
Battery life test Power Consumption efficiency (how quickly the processor reduces the battery charge)MediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 83% |
Snapdragon 685 | 83% |
Gaming performance Which CPU is better for gamingMediaTek Dimensity 7025 | 22% |
Snapdragon 685 | 19% |
Antutu v10, 9Antutu benchmark separately tests the performance of the CPU, GPU, and memory speed | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 685 | Total score | 530286 | 293373 | CPU | 148477 | 82144 | GPU | 201504 | 111483 | MEM | 84843 | 46936 | UX | 95447 | 52803 |
GeekBench 6, 5.2This benchmark shows Multi-threaded and Single-threaded processor performance | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 685 | Single-Core | 850 | 492 | Multi-Core | 2957 | 1605 |
Comparison of specifications
CPU and Memory | MediaTek Dimensity 7025 |
Snapdragon 685 | Frequency | 2500 MHz | 2800 MHz | Cores | 8 | 8 | Bit | 64 | 64 | Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm | Transistors count | | | Core configuration | 2x2.5 GHz ARM Cortex-A78 6x2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55 | 8x2.8 GHz Kryo 265 | Power consumption (TDP) | 7 W | 5 W | Memory type | LPDDR4x, LPDDR5 | LPDDR4x (Dual Channel) | Max. Memory | 16 Gb | 8 Gb | Memory Frequency | 2133 | 2133 | Memory bandwidth | 24 | 22 | Neural Processor (NPU) | Yes | Yes | L1 cache | | | L2 cache | | | L3 cache | | | Instruction set architecture (ISA) | ARMv8.4-A | ARMv8-A | In this comparison block, you should pay attention to the differences in clock speed and the number of cores. Here Snapdragon 685 is 10% better than MediaTek Dimensity 7025 in terms of CPU frequency. Also keep in mind that high CPU frequency affects battery life through power consumption.
GPU and MediaGPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Adreno 610 | GPU Frequency | 800 MHz | 750 MHz | GFloPS | 256 | 312 | # of Cores | 8 | | # of Shader Units | 256 | 192 | Display | 2520 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels | The frequency of the GPU does not always directly indicate its performance. To fully evaluate all the capabilities of a graphics chip, you should take into account the number of Shader Units and Cores, as well as how many GFlops it has.
Gaming benchmarkFortnite Mobile | 25.4 | 25.2 | PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds (PUBG Mobile) | 54.4 | 55.7 | Garena Free Fire - The Cobra | 51.3 | 60.2 | Call of Duty: Mobile | 53.4 | 54.4 | Grand Theft Auto V (GTA 5 Mobile) | 43.6 | 49.1 | Minecraft: Pocket Edition | 68.5 | 74.6 | Real Racing 3 | 103.8 | 75.3 | Sniper 3D | 114.5 | 96.7 | Need for Speed No Limits | 83.7 | 96.6 | Mortal Kombat X | 59.7 | 96.4 | CSR Racing 2 | 62.6 | 66.5 | The numbers in this table indicate the maximum FPS that was received on the device with the corresponding processor. Depending on the configuration of the gadget and graphics quality settings (Ultra, Medium, Normal), the results may differ quite significantly. We recommend that you better study the results of the Antutu v10, 9 and GeekBench 6, 5.2 becnmarks.
CamerasCamera resolution | 200 MP | 108 MP | Dual Camera resolution | 16 MP | 13 MP | Image Signal Processor (ISP) | | Qualcomm Spectra 365 | Video Encoding FPS | 240 | 60 | Video Encoding resolution | 4K, 2K, FullHD | 4K (Ultra HD), 2K, FullHD | Codec support | H.264, H.265/HEVC | H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, VP8, VP9 |
Networks and NavigationModem | 5G Multi-Mode | Qualcomm Snapdragon X11 LTE modem | Download speed | 2770 MBit/s. | 390 MBit/s. | Upload speed | 1500 MBit/s. | 150 MBit/s. | Navigation | Galileo E1 + E5a, BeiDou B1I+ B2a, NavIC, Glonass L1OF, QZSS L1CA+ L5, GPS L1CA+L5 | Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS, NavIC, GPS, QZSS | NFC support | No | No | 5G support | Yes | No |
Result:
The number of parameters for which MediaTek Dimensity 7025 is better: 23
The number of parameters for which Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 is better: 11 Please note that you do not need to sightlessly trust the automatic comparison of the table. It is better to just watch the full video of parallel comparison and hear what those who really appreciated the capabilities of both CPUs think, and also read the test results on the links under the article.
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 SoC Comparisons • Vs Apple A14 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus • Vs Apple A12X Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 1080 • Vs Apple A13 Bionic • Vs Samsung Exynos 990 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 • Vs Apple A12 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 820 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8300 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus • Vs Apple M2 • Vs Apple A17 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200 • Vs Google Tensor G3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200 • Vs Apple A16 Bionic • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs HiSilicon KIRIN 9000S • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 2200 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c+ Gen 3 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
Snapdragon 685 SoC Comparisons • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G • Vs MediaTek Helio G95 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 720 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G • Vs MediaTek Helio G96 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 800 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G99 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 700 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 850 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 • Vs MediaTek Helio G90T • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G • Vs MediaTek Helio G88 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 810 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7c Gen 2 • Vs Samsung Exynos 980 • Vs MediaTek Helio G85 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T612 • Vs MediaTek Helio G80 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T618 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 • Vs Google Tensor G2 • Vs Apple A15 Bionic • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Max • Vs Google Tensor • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100-Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1300T • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 1200 Max • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 1380 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000L • Vs Qualcomm Snapdargon 782G • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100 • Vs Qualcomm QCS6490 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 920 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 930 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T820 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 900T • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 820 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 800T • Vs Samsung Exynos 1380 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1280 • Vs Samsung Exynos 1330 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080 • Vs MediaTek MT8188J • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000-Max • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G • Vs Mediatek Dimensity 900 • Vs MediaTek Kompanio 828 • Vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 • Vs Qualcomm 215 • Vs Qualcomm 205 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T760 • Vs Unisoc T750 Tanggula • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus • Vs Rockchip RK3562 • Vs Unisoc Tiger T603 • Vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000SL • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 6300 • Vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra
| |
|